Skip to content

Task Prioritization

Prioritise a Brutal Backlog

AI Tools:
ChatGPT, Claude, GeminiWorks with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
Category: Productivity

Rank a backlog with explicit trade-offs: impact, effort, risk, and what you will not do this week.

Prompt Quality - 100/100 · Strong

The Prompt

prioritise-a-brutal-backlog.md

Prioritise this backlog. Be willing to say no.

Items:
{{items}}
Capacity this week: {{capacity}}
Strategy / theme: {{theme}}
Hard deadlines: {{deadlines}}

Return:
1. Ranked list with a one-line reason each (impact × urgency × effort)
2. This week's committed set that fits {{capacity}}
3. Explicit won't-do list
4. Anything that looks like a fake priority (busywork, someone else's urgency)

If items lack enough detail to rank, ask up to 5 clarifying questions first - then rank the rest.

Negative prompt

Included when you copy the prompt

Do not commit more work than {{capacity}} allows. Do not treat every request as equal - call out fake priorities and someone else's urgency. Do not invent scope, estimates, or deadlines missing from the input; ask clarifying questions instead (max 5). Do not omit an explicit won't-do list. Do not rank with buzzwords instead of impact × urgency × effort reasons. Do not sneak deadline items out of the committed set without saying what slips.

The PromptUTF-8

Fill in your details below - this prompt updates as you type, then copy it.

Fill in your details

0 of 4 filled. Preview updates as you type - then copy the finished prompt (negative prompt included when present).

Tasks or tickets.

Hours or points this week.

Current strategy or OKR.

Immovable dates.

prioritise-a-brutal-backlog.md

Prompt preview

Prioritise this backlog. Be willing to say no.

Items:
{{items}}
Capacity this week: {{capacity}}
Strategy / theme: {{theme}}
Hard deadlines: {{deadlines}}

Return:
1. Ranked list with a one-line reason each (impact × urgency × effort)
2. This week's committed set that fits {{capacity}}
3. Explicit won't-do list
4. Anything that looks like a fake priority (busywork, someone else's urgency)

If items lack enough detail to rank, ask up to 5 clarifying questions first - then rank the rest.
0 / 4 filledPreview

Examples

Example input

Items: - Finish onboarding checklist redesign (est. 8h) - activation OKR - Fix CSV export bug affecting 3 enterprise accounts (est. 5h) - Write Q3 board metrics narrative (est. 3h) - board Thursday - Explore AI summary feature spike (est. 6h) - CEO Slack ask - Clean up Storybook stories (est. 4h) - Migrate leftover pages to new design tokens (est. 10h) - Reply to design critique on mobile nav (est. 2h) - Draft hiring scorecard for senior FE (est. 3h) Capacity this week: 20 hours (IC designer-eng hybrid) Strategy / theme: Activation: raise Day-7 activated rate; stabilize enterprise trust Hard deadlines: Board deck narrative due Thursday 10:00; enterprise CSV fix promised Friday EOD

What you should get

Clarifying (none blocking - estimates present). Ranking with given estimates. 1. Ranked list 1. Board metrics narrative (3h) - hard Thursday deadline; high urgency, low effort 2. CSV export bug (5h) - enterprise trust + Friday promise; high impact/urgency 3. Onboarding checklist redesign (8h) - direct activation OKR; high impact 4. Hiring scorecard (3h) - supports capacity later; medium impact, flexible timing 5. Mobile nav critique reply (2h) - unblocks others; small effort 6. AI summary spike (6h) - CEO interest but not theme-critical this week 7. Storybook cleanup (4h) - hygiene / busywork vs activation 8. Design token migration (10h) - large, non-urgent; crowds out OKR work 2. Committed this week (20h) - Board narrative - 3h - CSV export fix - 5h - Onboarding checklist redesign - 8h - Mobile nav critique reply - 2h - Hiring scorecard - 2h (partial; finish next week if needed) Total 20h 3. Won't-do this week - AI summary spike - Storybook cleanup - Design token migration (remainder) - Hiring scorecard polish beyond 2h 4. Fake priorities - Storybook cleanup - tidy work dressed as progress - AI summary spike - executive curiosity without activation/enterprise link this week - Full token migration - looks strategic, steals the activation redesign

When to use this prompt

Use it when

  • You need help with pms.
  • You need help with team leads.
  • You need help with solo operators.

Skip it when

  • You only need a one-line ask with no constraints, format, or context.
  • You cannot supply the fill-in details the template asks for.
  • A different category or tool-specific workflow fits the job better.

How to get a good result

Done when

Clarifying (none blocking - estimates present). Ranking with given estimates. 1. Ranked list 1. Board metrics narrative (3h) - hard Thursday deadline; high urgency, low effort 2. CSV export bug (5h) - enterprise trust + Friday promise; high impact/urgency 3. Onboarding checklist redesign (8h) - direct activation OKR; high impact 4. Hiring scorecard (3h) - supports capacity later; medium impact, flexible timing 5. Mobile nav critique reply (2h) - unblocks others; small effort 6. AI summary spike (6h) - CEO interest but not theme-critical this week 7. Storybook cleanup (4h) - hygiene / busywork vs activation 8. Design token migration (10h) - large, non-urgent; crowds out OKR work 2. Committed this week (20h) - Board narrative - 3h - CSV export fix - 5h - Onboarding checklist redesign - 8h - Mobile nav critique reply - 2h - Hiring scorecard - 2h (partial; finish next week if needed) Total 20h 3. Won't-do this week - AI summary spike - Storybook cleanup - Design token migration (remainder) - Hiring scorecard polish beyond 2h 4. Fake priorities - Storybook cleanup - tidy work dressed as progress - AI summary spike - executive curiosity without activation/enterprise link this week - Full token migration - looks strategic, steals the activation redesign

Common mistakes

  • Leaving items, capacity, theme vague - the model then invents placeholders.
  • Asking ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for a shorter answer after a long structured prompt - that throws away the format rules.
  • Stopping when the first draft appears instead of checking it against the success criteria below.

FAQ

What do I fill in before I copy this prompt?
Replace these placeholders with your details: items, capacity, theme, deadlines. Required fields are marked on the page. The prompt text updates as you type.
Which AI tools is this prompt written for?
It works best with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini. Copy the filled prompt and paste it into the tool you already use.
What should a good result look like?
Clarifying (none blocking - estimates present). Ranking with given estimates. 1. Ranked list 1. Board metrics narrative (3h) - hard Thursday deadline; high urgency, low effort 2. CSV export bug (5h) - enterprise trust + Friday promise; high impact/urgency 3. Onboarding checklist redesign (8h) - direct activation OKR; high impact 4. Hiring scorecard (3h) - supports capacity later; medium impact, flexible timing 5. Mobile nav critique reply (2h) - unblocks others; small effort 6. AI summary sp…
What are common mistakes with this prompt?
Leaving items, capacity, theme vague - the model then invents placeholders. Asking ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for a shorter answer after a long structured prompt - that throws away the format rules. Stopping when the first draft appears instead of checking it against the success criteria below.

Best for

  • PMs
  • Team leads
  • Solo operators

More prompts like this — same topic and style.