Skip to content

KPI Analysis

KPI Review for a Weekly Meeting

AI Tools:
ChatGPT, Claude, GeminiWorks with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini
Category: Data & Analytics

Turn a stack of metrics into a one-page weekly: what moved, why it might have, and what to do.

Prompt Quality - 100/100 · Strong

The Prompt

kpi-review-for-a-weekly-meeting.md

Write a weekly KPI review.

Period: {{period}}
Metrics (name, this period, last period, target if any):
{{metrics}}
Known events (launches, outages, seasonality):
{{events}}
Audience: {{audience}}

One page:
1. Headline: the one number that matters this week
2. Table: metric / now / delta / vs target / one-line comment
3. 3 hypotheses for the biggest move - labelled as hypothesis, not fact
4. 3 actions (owner placeholders if I did not name people)
5. What to ignore (noise, vanity)

Do not invent causes that are not in {{events}} or the numbers. If data is incomplete, lead with that.

Negative prompt

Included when you copy the prompt

Do not invent causes beyond {{events}} and the metric deltas. Do not present hypotheses as proven facts. Do not pad with vanity metrics or equal weight on every line. Do not write a multi-page essay - keep it one page. Do not invent owners, targets, or events that were not provided. If metrics are incomplete, lead with that instead of a confident narrative.

The PromptUTF-8

Fill in your details below - this prompt updates as you type, then copy it.

Fill in your details

0 of 4 filled. Preview updates as you type - then copy the finished prompt (negative prompt included when present).

Week or month.

Names and numbers.

Launches, incidents, campaigns.

Leadership, team, board.

kpi-review-for-a-weekly-meeting.md

Prompt preview

Write a weekly KPI review.

Period: {{period}}
Metrics (name, this period, last period, target if any):
{{metrics}}
Known events (launches, outages, seasonality):
{{events}}
Audience: {{audience}}

One page:
1. Headline: the one number that matters this week
2. Table: metric / now / delta / vs target / one-line comment
3. 3 hypotheses for the biggest move - labelled as hypothesis, not fact
4. 3 actions (owner placeholders if I did not name people)
5. What to ignore (noise, vanity)

Do not invent causes that are not in {{events}} or the numbers. If data is incomplete, lead with that.
0 / 4 filledPreview

Examples

Example input

Period: Week of 2026-08-11 Metrics: Activation rate: 28% (was 31%, target 30%) Weekly active users: 12,400 (was 11,900, target 12,000) Paid conversion: 3.1% (was 3.0%, target 3.5%) Support tickets / 100 users: 4.8 (was 3.2, no target) NPS sample: n=40, score 32 (was 38) Known events: New onboarding checklist shipped Tue; 90-min API outage Thu afternoon; back-to-school promo live all week Audience: leadership

What you should get

1. Headline: Activation fell 3pp to 28% (below 30% target) in the same week we shipped new onboarding and had a Thu outage. 2. Table: WAU +500 vs last week / above target - healthy top of funnel. Activation 28% / −3pp / miss - primary concern. Paid conversion +0.1pp / still below target. Tickets +1.6 - watch. NPS drop on n=40 - treat as noisy. 3. Hypotheses (not facts): (H1) New checklist added friction for first-run users. (H2) Thu outage truncated sessions mid-activation. (H3) Promo mixed in lower-intent traffic that activates less. 4. Actions: Owner TBD - funnel drop-off by onboarding step for pre/post Tue. Owner TBD - quantify activation among users active during the outage window. Owner TBD - segment activation promo vs non-promo. 5. Ignore: NPS until n>200; raw ticket volume without severity; celebrating WAU alone while activation misses.

When to use this prompt

Use it when

  • You need help with pms.
  • You need help with founders.
  • You need help with ops.

Skip it when

  • You only need a one-line ask with no constraints, format, or context.
  • You cannot supply the fill-in details the template asks for.
  • A different category or tool-specific workflow fits the job better.

How to get a good result

Done when

1. Headline: Activation fell 3pp to 28% (below 30% target) in the same week we shipped new onboarding and had a Thu outage. 2. Table: WAU +500 vs last week / above target - healthy top of funnel. Activation 28% / −3pp / miss - primary concern. Paid conversion +0.1pp / still below target. Tickets +1.6 - watch. NPS drop on n=40 - treat as noisy. 3. Hypotheses (not facts): (H1) New checklist added friction for first-run users. (H2) Thu outage truncated sessions mid-activation. (H3) Promo mixed in lower-intent traffic that activates less. 4. Actions: Owner TBD - funnel drop-off by onboarding step for pre/post Tue. Owner TBD - quantify activation among users active during the outage window. Owner TBD - segment activation promo vs non-promo. 5. Ignore: NPS until n>200; raw ticket volume without severity; celebrating WAU alone while activation misses.

Common mistakes

  • Leaving period, metrics, events vague - the model then invents placeholders.
  • Asking ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for a shorter answer after a long structured prompt - that throws away the format rules.
  • Stopping when the first draft appears instead of checking it against the success criteria below.

FAQ

What do I fill in before I copy this prompt?
Replace these placeholders with your details: period, metrics, events, audience. Required fields are marked on the page. The prompt text updates as you type.
Which AI tools is this prompt written for?
It works best with ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini. Copy the filled prompt and paste it into the tool you already use.
What should a good result look like?
1. Headline: Activation fell 3pp to 28% (below 30% target) in the same week we shipped new onboarding and had a Thu outage. 2. Table: WAU +500 vs last week / above target - healthy top of funnel. Activation 28% / −3pp / miss - primary concern. Paid conversion +0.1pp / still below target. Tickets +1.6 - watch. NPS drop on n=40 - treat as noisy. 3. Hypotheses (not facts): (H1) New checklist added friction for first-run users. (H2) Thu outage truncated sessions mid-activation. (H3) Promo mixed i…
What are common mistakes with this prompt?
Leaving period, metrics, events vague - the model then invents placeholders. Asking ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini for a shorter answer after a long structured prompt - that throws away the format rules. Stopping when the first draft appears instead of checking it against the success criteria below.

Best for

  • PMs
  • Founders
  • Ops

More prompts like this — same topic and style.