Social Media
Real-Time X Sentiment Read
AI Tool:
GrokWorks with Grok
Category: Marketing
What people are actually posting on X right now - replies and niche accounts, not the official narrative. Use Grok's live X access.
Prompt Quality - 100/100 · Strong
The Prompt
grok-realtime-x-sentiment.md
Pull up what's actually being said about this on X right now, not the official narrative around it. TOPIC: {{topic}} TIMEFRAME: {{timeframe}} INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Search X for real reactions in the given timeframe - not just verified or large accounts. Include what smaller or niche accounts are saying; that is often where the actual sentiment lives before it gets smoothed out. 2. Separate what you find into three buckets: the loudest take (what's getting the most engagement, whether or not it's accurate), the most informed take (posts from people who clearly know the subject, even with lower engagement), and the contrarian take (the strongest pushback against the dominant narrative). 3. Note where the loudest take and the most informed take actually disagree - that gap is usually the interesting part. 4. Give me your own honest read: is the loud reaction proportionate to what actually happened, overblown, or underblown? Don't hedge this - pick a side and say why. 5. Flag anything that looks bot-driven or astroturfed if you notice a pattern. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Loudest take (with a rough sense of scale / engagement) - Most informed take - Contrarian take - Where they disagree - Your honest read (2 - 3 sentences, take a real position) - Any astroturfing / bot flags, if applicable CONSTRAINTS: - Don't just summarize headlines - I want what's in the replies and quote-posts. That's the point of asking you instead of searching myself. - If sentiment is genuinely mixed with no clear dominant take, say that plainly instead of forcing a false consensus.
Negative prompt
Included when you copy the prompt
Do not summarize news headlines instead of X replies and quote-posts. Do not ignore smaller or niche accounts. Do not hedge the honest read into "it's mixed" unless it genuinely is. Do not invent posts, engagement numbers, or bot-ring evidence - flag uncertainty instead.
The PromptUTF-8
Fill in your details below - this prompt updates as you type, then copy it.
Fill in your details
0 of 2 filled. Preview updates as you type - then copy the finished prompt (negative prompt included when present).
grok-realtime-x-sentiment.md
Prompt preview
Pull up what's actually being said about this on X right now, not the official narrative around it. TOPIC: {{topic}} TIMEFRAME: {{timeframe}} INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Search X for real reactions in the given timeframe - not just verified or large accounts. Include what smaller or niche accounts are saying; that is often where the actual sentiment lives before it gets smoothed out. 2. Separate what you find into three buckets: the loudest take (what's getting the most engagement, whether or not it's accurate), the most informed take (posts from people who clearly know the subject, even with lower engagement), and the contrarian take (the strongest pushback against the dominant narrative). 3. Note where the loudest take and the most informed take actually disagree - that gap is usually the interesting part. 4. Give me your own honest read: is the loud reaction proportionate to what actually happened, overblown, or underblown? Don't hedge this - pick a side and say why. 5. Flag anything that looks bot-driven or astroturfed if you notice a pattern. OUTPUT FORMAT: - Loudest take (with a rough sense of scale / engagement) - Most informed take - Contrarian take - Where they disagree - Your honest read (2 - 3 sentences, take a real position) - Any astroturfing / bot flags, if applicable CONSTRAINTS: - Don't just summarize headlines - I want what's in the replies and quote-posts. That's the point of asking you instead of searching myself. - If sentiment is genuinely mixed with no clear dominant take, say that plainly instead of forcing a false consensus.
0 / 2 filledPreview
Examples
Example input
Topic: Apple's latest iPhone price increase announced this morning Timeframe: last 12 hours
What you should get
Loudest / informed / contrarian buckets from live X, the disagreement between them, a 2 - 3 sentence unhedged read (proportionate / overblown / underblown), and any astroturf flags - not a news roundup.
When to use this prompt
Use it when
- You need help with researchers.
- You need help with founders.
- You need help with operators.
- You need help with writers.
Skip it when
- You only need a one-line ask with no constraints, format, or context.
- You cannot supply the fill-in details the template asks for.
- A different category or tool-specific workflow fits the job better.
How to get a good result
Done when
You get loudest / informed / contrarian takes from X, where they disagree, and a 2 - 3 sentence honest read with any bot flags.
Common mistakes
- Topic too broad (e.g. “AI”) - narrow to an event or announcement.
- Skipping timeframe so the model mixes old and new threads.
- Accepting a news roundup instead of reply/quote-post evidence.
FAQ
- What do I fill in before I copy this prompt?
- Replace these placeholders with your details: topic, timeframe. Required fields are marked on the page. The prompt text updates as you type.
- Which AI tools is this prompt written for?
- It works best with Grok. Copy the filled prompt and paste it into the tool you already use.
- What should a good result look like?
- You get loudest / informed / contrarian takes from X, where they disagree, and a 2 - 3 sentence honest read with any bot flags.
- What are common mistakes with this prompt?
- Topic too broad (e.g. “AI”) - narrow to an event or announcement. Skipping timeframe so the model mixes old and new threads. Accepting a news roundup instead of reply/quote-post evidence.
Best for
- Researchers
- Founders
- Operators
- Writers
Related Prompts
More prompts like this — same topic and style.